Center for Injury Research and Prevention

Comparable Walking Gait Performance During Executive and Non-Executive Cognitive Dual-Tasks in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study.

TitleComparable Walking Gait Performance During Executive and Non-Executive Cognitive Dual-Tasks in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsWalshe EA, Roche RAP, Ward C, Patterson M, O'Neill D, Collins R, Commins S
JournalGait Posture
Volume71
Pagination181-185
Date Published06/2019
Type of Articlejournal
ISSN1879-2219
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Falls are a serious problem among stroke survivors due to subsequent injuries, recovery setbacks, dependence, and mortality. A growing body of dual-task (DT) studies suggests a role of executive functions in gait control and falls, particularly in subacute stroke. However, few studies have compared distinct executive and non-executive tasks, nor their effects on chronic stroke gait.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the effects of distinct working memory (2-back) and inhibition (Stroop) tasks on walking gait performance in chronic stroke survivors.

METHODS: A pilot sample of chronic stroke survivors (n = 11, 8 males, mean age = 70.91, 6-12months post-stroke event) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 13, 4 male; mean age = 68.46) were tested. Gait performance (speed, stride time, stride time variability, stride length and stride length variability) was measured using 2 wireless inertial measurement sensors under 4 walking conditions: 1) preferred walking (single-task: ST), 2) walking with a 2-back DT, 3) walking with a Stroop DT, and 4) walking with a non-executive motor response DT. The secondary tasks were also carried out in both ST (seated) and DT conditions, to examine bidirectional effects.

RESULTS: While the stroke survivor sample had a slower gait speed across conditions and tasks, there were no significant differences between the groups [F(1, 22) = 1.13, p =.299, ηp =  .049] on the spatial or temporal gait characteristics recorded: gait performance was maintained during executive and non-executive DTs. In addition, we did not find a significant effect of group on cognitive task performance (all p > .052). However, we observed a cost in accuracy on the 2-back DT for both groups, suggesting resource overlap and greater cognitive load (all t > 19.72, all p <  .001).

SIGNIFICANCE: Our gait data contradict previous studies evidencing impaired gait post-stroke, suggesting functional recovery in this chronic stroke sample.

DOI10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.004
Alternate JournalGait Posture
PubMed ID31075661